检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]泰州市口腔医院修复科,副主任医师江苏225300 [2]泰州市疾病预防控制中心,副主任医师江苏225300 [3]南京医科大学附属口腔医院种植修复科,主任医师教授江苏210029
出 处:《口腔颌面修复学杂志》2017年第5期270-272,共3页Chinese Journal of Prosthodontics
摘 要:目的:通过双线排龈方法对前牙固定修复的取模效果进行评价。方法:采取对照法,选取140例前牙固定修复患者,分为70例实验组,70例对照组,对照组采用单线排龈法,观察组采用双线排龈法。结果:双线排龈法优良率97.14%,单线排龈法优良率81.42%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组不良反应发生率8.57%,明显低于对照组的30.00%。以上比较,观察组的临床效果均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:双线排龈法用于临床效果显著,基本可保证基牙预备后获取精确清晰的印模,达到满足前牙修复体的准确制作和美学要求。Objective: To evaluate the clinical effect of two-gingival retraction cord technique in anterior tooth fixed restoration. Methods: 140 patients indicated with anterior tooth fixed prosthesis were selected and randomly divided into two groups, two-gingival retraction cord group (observation group), and one-gingival retraction cord group as control. There was 70 teeth each group. Results: There was significant difference between two group (P〈0.05). Observation group (97.14%) and control group (81.42%). The adverse reaction ratio of observation group was lower than that of control group. Conclusion: Two-gingival retraction cord technique showed a better clinical effect compared to one-gingival retraction cord technique during anterior tooth fixed and esthetic restoration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175