王皓马琳正手直板弧圈球技术的运动学特征对比分析  

A Kinematics Comparison Analysis on Pen-hold Forehand Loop Drive Techniques of Wang Hao and Ma Lin

作　　者：张晓栋[1] 张志伟[2] 肖丹丹[3] 吴瑜[4] 

机构地区：[1]华北电力大学体育部,北京102206 [2]北京劳动保障职业学院,北京198504 [3]国家体育总局体育科学研究所,北京100061 [4]北京体育大学,北京100084

出　　处：《沈阳体育学院学报》2017年第5期110-114,共5页Journal of Shenyang Sport University

基　　金：国家体育总局体育科学研究所基础业务费项目(基本15-05;16-44)

摘　　要：运用瑞典产QUALISYS-MCU500红外远射测试系统,对王皓、马琳正手弧圈球的动作技术进行了测试。通过对比分析,揭示了王皓和马琳正手弧圈球动作技术的运动学特征与异同,以期为乒乓球动作技术的科学诊断与训练提供依据。得出以下结论:(1)在引拍阶段,与马琳相比,王皓的右上臂离身体较远,右肘伸展的幅度和右髋、膝屈曲程度不如马琳充分;王皓和马琳躯干扭转非常充分。(2)挥拍击球阶段,王皓和马琳膝关节蹬伸动作不明显,伴有明显的旋内动作,蹬伸动作主要是通过展髋来实现,王皓的展髋幅度比马琳小。(3)击球时刻,王皓挥拍的速度低于马琳,一定程度上表明王皓正手直板弧圈球技术的击球效果不及马琳。The forehand loop drive techniques of Wang Hao and Ma Lin were tested, using the measurement methods of the QUALISYS kinematics measurements system. Kinematics Characters of Wang Hao and Ma Lin were described and compared, hoping to give some suggestion for diagnosis and training of table tennis techniques. The conclusions were as follows ： 1. During the phase of swinging the racket backwards, Wang Hao＇ s fight upper arm was farther away from the body than that of Ma Lin. The width of the fight elbow, the abduction of hip and knee of Wang Hao were less than those of Ma Lin. The torsion of Wang Hao and Ma Lin＇ s torso were very sufficient. 2. During the swing and attacking racket phrase, the fight knee＇ s stretching of two players were not obvious, but with the right knee＇ intorsion. The stretching of lower limbs mainly focused on the stretching of patella joint. The range of stretching of patella joint for Wang Hao was smaller than that of Ma Lin. 3. The attacking speed of Wang Hao was lower than that of Ma Lin, which suggested the attacking effect of the forehand loop drive techniques of Wang Hao was not good as that of Ma Lin.

关 键 词：乒乓球 运动学 正手弧圈球技术 王皓 马琳 

分 类 号：G846[文化科学—体育训练]