宫颈锥切术与根治性子宫颈切除术治疗宫颈原位癌的临床效果对比  

Comparison of clinical effects of cervical conization and radical hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma in situ

作　　者：蒋红 

机构地区：[1]江苏省镇江市润州区工业园区社区卫生服务中心,212005

出　　处：《中国社区医师》2017年第34期57-57,59,共2页Chinese Community Doctors

摘　　要：目的:探讨宫颈锥切术与根治性子宫颈切除术治疗宫颈原位癌的疗效。方法:收治宫颈原位癌患者60例,随机分成观察组和对照组。对照组采用宫颈锥切术治疗,观察组采用根治性子宫颈切除术治疗,比较两组治疗效果。结果:两组手术时间和术中出血量比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组优良率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:根治性子宫颈切除治疗宫颈原位癌不仅能够保留生育能力,而且疗效与宫颈锥切术差异不大。Objective:To explore the clinical effects of cervical conization and radical hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma in situ.Methods:60 patients with cervical carcinoma in situ were selected.They were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group.The control group was treated by cervical conization,and the observation group was treated with radical hysterectomy.We compared the therapeutic effect of two groups.Results:The differences of operation time and bleeding volume between groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in excellent and good rate between groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Radical hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma in situ not only can retain potentia generandi,but also the effect was not very different from that of cervical conization.

关 键 词：宫颈锥切术 根治性子宫颈切除术 子宫颈原位癌 

分 类 号：R737.33[医药卫生—肿瘤]