科学理论的结构与形而上学  

Structure of Scientific Theory and Metaphysics

作　　者：刘华军 LIU Hua - jun(School of Marxism, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, Chin)

机构地区：[1]贵州大学马克思主义学院,贵阳550025

出　　处：《科学技术哲学研究》2017年第6期1-6,共6页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology

基　　金：贵州大学人文一般项目"马克思主义自然哲学研究"(GDYB2014001)

摘　　要：科学结构实在论没有处理好形而上学论题。第一,结构实在论作"本质"与"结构"二分,从"本质"的坏之中区分出"结构"的好,错误理解和使用所谓"指称的因果论"。第二,以"结构"的客观性否定反实在论对于客观性的消解,可是"没有关系者的关系"又如何才能说明结构的客观性。没有客观性,结构的实在性又如何保证。第三,ESR与OSR是个体及其内在性讨论的两个进路。内在特性不可知将会导致形而上学与认识论之间出现裂隙。当追问个体内在特性,OSR须以不充分决定性命题否定个体内在性。相反,若承认结构关系与因果关系能够互换,则要承认个体的内在性。第四,OSR把结构作为本体论,却无法回答"空的结构如何起到解释原因的作用?"Structural realism of science could not deal with the metaphysical thesis well. Firstly,structure realism which distinguishes ＂structure＂from ＂essence＂,misunderstands and misuses the so-called ＂causal theory of reference＂. Secondly,how can we explain the objectivity of the structure without relationship of relata？ And how the nature of the structure is guaranteed without objectivity？ Thirdly,inaccessibility of intrinsic character will lead to a gap between metaphysics and epistemology. OSR must negate the individual internality by underdetermination. But you must recognize individuality if you insist that causality can be replaced by structures. Fourth,OSR takes the structure as ontology,but it can＇t answer ＂how can the empty structure play a role in explaining？＂

关 键 词：结构实在论 本体论 形而上学 内在性 因果关系 

分 类 号：N02[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]