检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宫琪 孙惠强[2] 胡以俊[3] 陈佳[3] 丁伟山[3] Gong Qi;Sun Huiqiang;Hu Yo'un;Chen Jia;Ding Weishan(Dept. of Cosmetic Center, Jinan Stomatological Hospital, Jinan 250001, China;Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Shandong University, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration, Jinan 250012, China;Dept. of Special Clinic, School of Stomatology, Shandong University, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration, Jinan 250012, China)
机构地区:[1]济南市口腔医院医学美容中心,济南250001 [2]山东大学口腔医院修复科山东省口腔组织再生重点实验室,济南250012 [3]山东大学口腔医院特诊科,济南250012
出 处:《华西口腔医学杂志》2017年第6期598-602,共5页West China Journal of Stomatology
基 金:山东省科技发展计划(2014GSF118065)~~
摘 要:目的比较不同表面处理方法对氧化锆基底与饰面瓷之间的结合强度及结合界面微观结构的影响。方法将WIELAND氧化锆瓷块胚体烧结制成10 mm×5 mm×5 mm大小试件33个。将试件随机分为3组,每组11个。喷砂组在烧结前进行喷砂处理;处理剂组先喷砂处理,再烧结结合衬底瓷;对照组不做处理。3组基底瓷材料采用粉浆涂塑法烧结5 mm×5 mm×5 mm大小的饰面瓷。每组随机抽取1个基底瓷及双层瓷试件,采用扫描电镜、能谱分析方法,研究氧化锆底瓷与饰面瓷之间的结合情况。其余试件则通过电子拉伸机测试结合界面的剪切强度,并用SPSS17.0软件对实验数据进行统计学分析。结果喷砂组、处理剂组、对照组试件的剪切强度分别为(18.06±0.59)、(21.04±1.23)、(13.80±1.54)MPa,各组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论氧化锆胚体烧结前喷砂处理能提高氧化锆基底冠与饰面瓷的结合强度,结合衬底瓷的应用能提高氧化锆基底冠与饰面瓷的结合强度。Objective To compare the effect of different surface processes on bond strength and microscopic structure using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and an energy distribution spectrum (EDS) at the bonding interface between zirconia framework and veneering ceramic. Methods WIELAND zirconia core material was cut into 33 rectangular specimens and fired on into rectangular specimens (10 mm×5 mm×5 mm). The specimens were randomly divided into three groups (n= 11). The sandblasting group was sandblasted before firing. The sandblasting and liner coverage group was sandblasted before firing and then sintered with liner coverage after feting. The control group was not processed. All the veneering ceramics (5 mm×5 mm×5mm) were fired on into the zirconia substructure by slip-casting technique. One bilayered specimen in each group was prepared for SEM and EDS to examine the bonding conditions. The other specimens were measured for shear force using an electronic universal dynamometer. The data obtained were analyzed by using the statistical software SPSS 17.0. Results The values of the shear bond strength test were (13.80±1.54) MPa for the control group, (18.06±0.59) MPa for the sandblasting group, and (21.04±1.23) MPa for the sandblasting and liner coverage group. Significant differences existed among the three groups (P〈0.01). Conclusion Abrasion before firing significantly increases the shear bond strength ofzirconia to veneering porcelain. The use of porcelain combined with liner increases the shear bond strength.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.239.85