检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓永梅[1] 胡秀兰[2] 武美茹[3] 梁建姝[4] 尹志科[3]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经病学中心,100050 [2]首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经介入病房,100050 [3]首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院血管神经病学一病区,100050 [4]首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院护理部,100050
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2017年第29期3784-3787,共4页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
摘 要:目的 探讨工作坊式护理查房在神经内科护士专科培训中的效果.方法 将神经内科病房工作的134名责任护士分成观察组71名与对照组63名.观察组采用工作坊式护理查房模式进行专科培训,对照组采用传统模式进行专科培训,比较两组护士疾病相关知识的掌握情况及患者对护理工作的满意度.结果 实施工作坊式护理查房后,评价观察组熟练护士对患者的病情掌握为(80.8±9.2)分、护理措施落实(85.9±8.4)分、健康教育的实施(86.3±8.1)分,均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为4.015、7.075、9.319;P〈0.01).观察组护士护理的患者对护理工作满意度高于对照组(P〈0.05).结论 工作坊式护理查房能够使责任制整体护理得到有效实施,提高患者满意度.Objective To explore effect of workshop nursing ward rounds on specialist training for nurse of Neurology Department.Methods Totals of 134 nurses of Neurology Department were randomly divided in two groups, 71 nurses in the intervention group and 63 nurses in the control group. The nurses of intervention group received specialist training based on workshop nursing ward rounds, while the nurse of control group received specialist training of traditional mode. We compared two groups of nurses about disease-related knowledge and patient satisfaction with nursing work.Results The nurses of intervention group have higher scores than the nurses of control group in following aspects: patient's condition (80.8±9.2), implementation of nursing measures (85.9±8.4), and implementation of health education (86.3±8.1) (t=4.015, 7.075, 9.319;P〈0.01). The patient's satisfaction in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group (P〈0.05).Conclusions Workshop nursing ward rounds in neurology specialist training can make the responsibility system nursing effectively implemented and improve the patient satisfaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.31.104