检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张丽杨[1] 颜建周[1] 孙圆圆[1] 邵蓉[1]
机构地区:[1]中国药科大学国家药物政策与医药产业经济研究中心,南京211198
出 处:《中国新药杂志》2017年第22期2625-2630,共6页Chinese Journal of New Drugs
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目--我国创新药物政策环境研究(15ZDB167);中央高校基本科研业务费项目(人文培育):药品再评价法律制度研究(2016RPY003)
摘 要:我国的药品特殊审评体系经过多年的发展取得了显著进展,但在审评质量和效率上同发达国家仍存在较大差距。本文深入分析我国特殊审评体系存在的问题,基于对美国特殊审评体系和上市后临床研究的经验借鉴,提出完善多通道的特殊审评体系并建立特殊审评与上市后再评价的衔接的具体建议,以期提升审评效率,激发创新热情。Expedited review in China has made a significant progress after years of development,but there's still a large gap in the quality and efficiency of the review compared with developed countries. This paper made an in-depth analysis of the existing problems of expedited review in China. Based on the experience from expedited review and post-marketing clinical study in the U. S.,specific suggestions were put forward to improve a multi-channel system of expedited review and establish the link between expedited review and post-marketing drug reevaluation. We expect the improvement of review efficiency and the inspiration of innovation enthusiasm through the suggestions provided by this paper.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28