检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜文娟 沈开金[2] 韩小博 何艳梅[2] 马志强[2] 敖其[2] 马莉[2]
机构地区:[1]新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院急救中心,新疆830000 [2]新疆军区总医院
出 处:《中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志》2017年第11期1030-1034,共5页China Journal of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine
基 金:新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(2010211A35)
摘 要:目的探讨“包干制”模式在急诊科救治批量伤病员的效果。方法回顾性分析2009年8月-2011年12月新疆军区总医院急诊科收治的16批177例批量危重伤员创伤严重程度评分(injury severity scale,ISS)均≥16为对照组,采用传统的急救模式;2012—2014年收治的18批169例批量伤员为实验组,采用“包干制”模式,将两组抢救成功率、急诊滞留时间、患者满意度等结果进行统计分析比较。结果与对照组比较,实验组应用“包干制”模式救治伤员成功率高、急诊滞留时间短(P〈0.05或P〈0.01),满意度高。结论“包干制”模式在批量伤员急诊科救治环节中缩短急诊滞留时间,提高了伤员救治的成功率和满意度。Objective To explore the effective of the contract mode on the rescue of the batch wounded person. Methods Totally 16 batches of 177 severe mass injured patients from 2009 to 2011 and 18 batches of 169 severe mass injured patients from 2012 to 2014 were enrolled . The experimental group received routine rescue model and the control group accepted the contract model respectively. The success rate,stay-time in the emergency department and the satisfaction of patients from the statistics were compared between the two groups. Results Comparing with the control group, the success rate in the experimental group was higher (P 〈 0.05) and their stay-time in the emergency department were significantly shortened (P 〈 0.01). Actually, the statistics of the satisfaction from experimental group was higher than the controls. Conclusion The Contract mode played a feasible role in reducing the stay-time in the emergency department and increasing the success rate of rescue and satisfaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.118