机构地区:[1]海南省人民医院,海口570311
出 处:《山东医药》2017年第40期22-25,共4页Shandong Medical Journal
基 金:海南省自然科学基金资助项目(20168283)
摘 要:目的探讨沉默钙连蛋白(Calnexin)对肾母细胞瘤细胞凋亡及内质网应激、JNK信号通路的影响。方法将肾母细胞瘤SK-NEP-1细胞分为对照组、空载体组、实验组。对照组正常培养不转染。空载体组转染空白质粒,实验组转染Calnexin shRNA。转染24 h后全部更换为正常培养液继续培养48 h。采用实时荧光定量PCR法检测各组Calnexin mRNA表达,TUNEL法检测细胞凋亡指数(AI),Western blotting法检测葡萄糖调节蛋白78(GRP78)、需肌醇酶1(IRE1)、肿瘤坏死因子受体相关因子2(TRAF2)、凋亡信号调节激酶1(ASK1)、磷酸化凋亡信号调节激酶1(p-ASK1)、c-Jun N末端激酶(JNK)及磷酸化c-Jun N末端激酶(p-JNK)蛋白相对表达量。结果 Calnexin mRNA相对表达量:实验组、空载体组、对照组分别为0.28±0.01、1.01±0.06、1.00±0.08;实验组低于空载体组和对照组(P<0.05),但空载体组与对照组比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。AI:实验组、空载体组、对照组分别为32.86±3.72、5.46±0.68、5.26±0.17;实验组高于空载体组和对照组(P<0.05),但空载体组与对照组比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。GRP78、IRE1、TRAF2、ASK1、p-ASK1、JNK及p-JNK蛋白相对表达量:实验组高于空载体组和对照组(P均<0.05),但空载体组与对照组比较无统计学差异(P均>0.05)。结论沉默Calnexin可引发内质网应激并激活JNK细胞凋亡通路,进而促进肾母细胞瘤SK-NEP-1细胞凋亡。Objective To investigate the effects of silencing calnexin on the apoptosis , endoplasmic reticulum stress , and JNK signaling pathway of human nephroblastoma cells .Methods The nephroblastoma SK-NEP-1 cells were divided into the control group , empty vector group , and experimental group .The cells in the control group were not transfected . The cells in the empty vector group were transfected with the blank plasmid , and the experimental group with Calnexin shR-NA.After 24-hour transfection, all were replaced with normal culture medium and then were cultured for 48 h.The expres-sion of Calnexin mRNA was detected by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR .The apoptotic index ( AI) was detected by TUNEL method.Western blotting was used to detect the relative expression of glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), ino-sitol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1), tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2), apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1), p-ASK1, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and phosphorylated c-Jun N-terminal kinase (p-JNK) pro-tein.Results The relative expression of calnexin mRNA was 0.28 ±0.01, 1.01 ±0.06, and 1.00 ±0.08 in the experi-mental group , empty vector group , and control group , respectively .The experimental group was lower than the empty vec-tor group and the control group (P&lt;0.05), but there was no significant difference between the empty vector group and the control group (P〉0.05).AI in the experimental group, empty vector group, and control group were 32.86 ±3.72, 5.46 ±0.68, and 5.26 ±0.17; the experimental group was higher than the empty vector group and the control group ( P〈0.05), but there was no significant difference between the empty vector group and the control group (P〉0.05).The rela-tive expression levels of GRP78, IRE1, TRAF2, ASK1, p-ASK1, JNK and p-JNK were higher in the experimental group than those in the empty vector group and the control group (all P〈0.05), but there was no significant difference be
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...