列维-斯特劳斯神话理论的符号哲学研究  

A Criticism of Levi-Strauss' Structural Mythology from a Perspective of Semiotic Philosophy

作　　者：李泉[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川师范大学外国语学院,成都610065

出　　处：《河南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第6期35-42,共8页Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology(Social science)

基　　金：国家社科基金西部项目(16XZW007)

摘　　要：列维-斯特劳斯的结构主义人类神话学注重运用跨文化、跨学科研究的方法,推崇实证性分析和逻辑推演的研究范式,不但在探索"心智"哲学中获取了深刻洞见,而且对打通人文社会科学与自然科学学科壁垒的深化性跨学科研究具有开创性意义。从符号哲学体系的认知论、本体论与方法论三个层面解读列维-斯特劳斯的结构主义人类神话学分析,能够从体系上透视列结构主义神话批评范式理论的可行性与局限性。基于结构主义人类神话学的符号哲学批评为学界从符号表意之维认知人类自身和人类处境,以及从人本符号哲学视域的文化结构层面把握人的本质特征提供了文学哲学基础。Levi-Strauss adopted a method of cross-cultural and interdisciplinary to explore the deep insight hidden behind “the philosophy of mind”？ His academic method, which focused on empirical analysis and logical deduction, form a pioneering paradigm for the future studies to break the barrier between the liberal arts, social science and nature science. From a systematic perspective of Semiotic Philosophy, this paper makes holistic study on Levi-Strauss ’ Structural Anthropological Mythology upon three levels ： Epistemology, Ontology and Methodology, then makes a deep investigation on its theoretical feasibility and limitations as an analytic paradigm in the field of mythology. Based upon those analyzing, the academy could gain a fuller understanding towards the representation and expression of the significance of signs from the Structuralism Mythology, then give a deeper cultural, structural reflection of human existence and human nature as well as the basis of semiotic basis of Ontology Humanism.

关 键 词：列维-斯特劳斯 结构主义 神话学 符号哲学 二元分析 野性思维 

分 类 号：I0-02[文学—文学理论]