机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学第五附属医院泌尿外科,乌鲁木齐830011 [2]新疆生产建设兵团医院泌尿外科,乌鲁木齐830011
出 处:《中华实验外科杂志》2017年第12期2026-2030,共5页Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery
摘 要:目的探讨下调组蛋白去乙酰化酶(HDAC)家族成员HDAC1和HDAC2表达抑制前列腺癌细胞恶性表型及其作用机制。方法运用脂质体2000转染试剂将siHDAC转染或HDAC1抑制剂MHY219作用LNCaP和DU145细胞,命名为LNCaP—siHDAC、DU145-siHDAC细胞和阴性对照LNCaP—NC小干扰RNA(siRNA)、DU145-NCsiRNA细胞;Westernblot检测HDAC1、HDAC2、HDAC3、基质金属蛋白酶(MMP)-1、MMP-2、MMP-9、基质金属蛋白酶抑制因子(TIMP)-1蛋白表达,RealtimeRT—PCR检测MMP-1、MMP-2、MMP-9、TIMP-1mRNA的表达水平。噻唑蓝(M.rr)、克隆形成实验及Transwell法检测细胞活性、克隆形成能力和迁移率。结果LNCaP—siHDAC和DU145.siHDAC细胞中HDAC1和HDAC2相对表达量分别为0.22±0.Ol、0.25±0.02和0.15±0.叭、0.30±0.03,显著低于NCsiRNA组1.00±0.05和1.00±0.03(F㈨。P=289.440,P=0.008,FDU145=336.125,P=0.002);MHY219处理的LNCaP和DU145细胞中HDAC1和HDAC2相对表达量分别为0.53±0.04、0.60±0.02和0.58±0.04、0.66±0.05,显著低于Untreated组(1.00±0.03)(FLNCaP=147.158,P=0.022;FDJ145=134.573,P=0.035)。LNCaP—siHDAC和DU145-siHDAC细胞活性分别为(40.38±4.16)%和(21.42±5.26)%,与NCsiRNA组(98.47±6.70)%和(99.15±7.00)%比较差异有统计学意义(FlncAp=125.627,P=0.004;FDu145=137.560,P=0.000);MHY219处理的LNCaP和DU145细胞活性分别为(61.75±7.12)%和(45.00±5.53)%,显著低于Untreated组(99.34±7.12)%和(98.58±8.05)%(FLNCAph=88.392,P=0.032;FDU145=103.10,P=0.017)。LNCaP—siHDAC和DU145-siHDAC细胞克隆形成率分别为(26.37±3.50)%和(19.48±2.33)%,与NCsiRNA组(97.20±7.88)%和(99.23±9.52)%比较差异有统计学意义(F㈨。P=287,653,P=0,000;FnU。=315.042,P=0.000);MHY219处理的LNCaP和DU145细胞Objective Histone deacetylase (HDAC) promoted growth and metastasis of prostate cancer cell and it' s action mechanism, however, remain unclear. The aim of present study is investigate the suppression and action mechanism of malignant phenotype by downregulating expression of histone deacetylase ( HDAC1 and HDAC2) in prostate cancer cell. Methods Prostate cancer cell lines, LNCaP and DU145 cells were transfected with siHDAC using liposome 2000 or treated with MHY219, named as LNCaP- siHDAC, DU145 -siHDAC cells negative control LNCaP- NC small interfering RNA (siRNA), DU145- NCsiRNA cells, and the expressions of HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) - 1, MMP - 2, MMP - 9 and TIMP - 1 protein were determined by Western blotting and the levels of MMP - 1, MMP - 2, MMP - 9 and TIMP - 1 mRNA were detected using Real time RT - PCR. Cell via- bility, clone formation ability and metastasis were monitored using MTF, clone formation assay and Tran- swell respectively in LNCaP and DU145 cells. Results The relative expression levels of HDAC1 and HDAC2 protein was respectively 0. 22 ± 0.01, 0. 25 ± 0. 02 in LNCaP - siHDAC cell and 0. 15 ± 0. 01, 0. 30 ± 0. 03 in DU145 - siHDAC celI, and significantly lower than LNCaP - NCsiRNA ( 1.00 ± 0. 05, FLNCae = 289. 440, P = 0. 008) and DU145 - - NCsiRNA ( 1.00 ± 0.03, FDU145 = 336. 125, P = 0. 002). The relative expression levels of HDAC1 and HDAC2 protein was respectively 0. 53 ± 0. 04, 0. 60 ± 0.02 in LNCaP cell and 0. 58 ± 0. 04, 0. 66 ± 0.05 in DU145 cell treated with MHY219, and significantly lower than Untreated group (FLNCaP = 147. 158, P =0. 022 ;FDuI45 = 134. 573, P = 0. 035). The results from the MTI" indicated that cell viability was respectively (40. 38 ± 4. 16 )% in LNCaP- siHDAC cell and (21.42 ± 5.26) % in DU145 - siHDAC cell with statistical differences compared with LNCaP - NCsiRNA cell [(98.47 ± 6.70)%, FLNCaP = 125.627, P= 0.004] and DU145 - NCsiRNA cell [(99. 15 ± 7. 00)%, FDu145 = 137. 560
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...