检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《河南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年第6期24-29,36,共7页Journal of Henan University of Technology:Social Science Edition
摘 要:刑事速裁程序有利于优化诉讼资源、提高诉讼效率和保障程序正义。目前我国正在试点的刑事速裁程序取得了一定成效,也促成了一些制度上的创新,但我国刑事速裁程序也存在适用范围过窄等立法不足和适用率不高等司法实践缺陷。构建我国刑事速裁程序,应充分考虑相关因素,包括程序简易程度、轻案范围、当事人权利保障、量刑优惠和证明标准等。认为我国应借鉴域外刑事速裁程序的两种模式,立足我国刑事诉讼实践,增设协商式速裁程序,完善我国目前试行的刑事速裁程序。The criminal quick decision procedure helps to optimize the lawsuit resources,raises the lawsuit efficiency and the guarantee procedural justice.At present,certain achievements have been made in the criminal trial procedure in China,which contributes to some institutional innovations.However,there are some defects in judicial procedure,such as narrow application scope,inadequate legislation and low rate of application.The establishment of the criminal quick decision procedure in China involves not only giving full consideration to the related factors including such aspects as procedural simplicity,the scope of minor cases,the protection of the rights of the parties concerned,the preferential measurement of penalty and the standard of proof and so on,but also using for reference the two models of the extraterritorial criminal procedure based on the practice of criminal procedure in China,establishing negotiated quick decision procedure and perfecting the current criminal trial procedure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222