检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年第6期54-61,共8页Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)
摘 要:目前衡量会计稳健性最常见的方法是1997年Basu提出的盈余与股票回报模型,他将盈余反应非对称作为会计稳健性的测度。近年来,有学者提出成本粘性可以作为盈余反应不对称的另一种解释。本文选取我国2009—2015年的A股上市公司为样本,在Basu的盈余与股票回报模型基础上加入成本粘性变量,研究发现标准的盈余与股票回报模型得到的稳健性水平显著降高,通过分行业与分年份比较发现控制成本粘性前后得到的会计稳健差异性也有显著不同。Though the most common method of measuring accounting conservatism is the model of earnings and stock returns put forward by Basu in 1997,some scholars argued that asymmetric behavior of costs could be an explanation for asymmetric timeliness.After selecting the 2009—2015 listed IPO companies as the samples,we conduct a study based on the earnings and stock returns model of Basu and additionally modify the model with cost stickiness as a missing variable.The results show that the standard models overestimate the level of accounting conservatism and the variation of conservatism also changes greatly after we branch off industries and years.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.123.198