2种夜间急诊处理急性牙髓炎方法的临床疗效比较  

Comparative study of pain releasing effect of two approaches to acute pulpitis in the night emergency

作　　者：刘建[1] 施存山 LIU Jian;SHI Cun-shan.(Department of Stomatology, People ~s Hospital of Taizhou City. Taizhou 225300, Jiangsu Province, Chin)

机构地区：[1]江苏省泰州市人民医院口腔科,江苏泰州225300

出　　处：《上海口腔医学》2017年第6期669-671,共3页Shanghai Journal of Stomatology

摘　　要：目的 :对2种夜间急诊处理急性牙髓炎的方法进行比较。方法 :将223例夜间就诊的急性牙髓炎患者(223颗牙)随机分为2组。试验组(107例)开髓后,去冠髓,封甲醛甲酚(FC)2 d;对照组(109例)开髓后,开放引流2 d。2组患者均在术后第2天复诊,了解疼痛缓解的情况。采用SPSS19.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果:试验组疼痛指数均值为1.23,低于对照组3.58,差异显著(P<0.05);试验组治疗有效率为93.46%,显著高于对照组的77.98%(P<0.05)。结论 :急性牙髓炎患者在去冠髓后暂封FC,比开放引流处理能更有效地缓解疼痛。PURPOSE： To compare the clinical effect of 2 methods for acute pulpitis in the night emergency. METHODS： Two hundred and twenty-three patients with acute pulpitis were randomly divided into experimental group （107 cases） and control group （109 cases）. Patients in the experimental group was enclosed formaldehyde cresol （FC） with CAVITON-GC after removal of crown pulp, while patients in the control group was treated with open drainage. Pain releasing effect was evaluated and analyzed 2 days after treatment.The data were analysed by t test and χ2 test with SPSS19.0 software package. RESULTS： The average pain index of the experimental group was 1.23, which was lower than that of the control group （3.58）, the difference was significant （P〈0.05）. The treatment efficiency was 93.46% in the experimental group, significantly higher than that in the control group （77.98% , P〈0.05）. CONCLUSIONS： Treatment in the experimental group is more effective to relieve pain than simple drainage in the control group.

关 键 词：急性牙髓炎 开髓引流 疗效 

分 类 号：R781.31[医药卫生—口腔医学]