《金瓶梅词话》叙事时间的若干问题  

Several Issues Concerning the Narrative Time in Cihua Edition of The Golden Lotus

作　　者：张石川[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学文学院,江苏南京210097

出　　处：《南京师范大学文学院学报》2017年第4期65-71,共7页Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture Nanjing Normal University

摘　　要：细致梳理《金瓶梅词话》叙事时间,探讨小说中存在的几类叙事时间的"失误",尤其是小说最后几回中叙事时间错漏严重,使得这部分游离于小说叙事主体故事之外。分析小说十二回和三十九回中有关星占的文字时,发现小说存在两套不同的叙事时间。可作如下两条推论:其一,《金瓶梅词话》在写作过程中,放弃了原来的一套干支纪年的叙事时间,把干支记年整体推移,以迎合《水浒传》的叙事年代。其二,存在一套与《水浒传》故事时间不吻合的干支纪年的叙事时间,意味着小说并不是在《水浒传》的叙事基础上展开创作,而是把另外一个蓝本故事嵌入《水浒传》的叙事体系中。By careful carding of the narrative time in the cihua edition of The Golden Lotus, this paper points out several mistakes in the narrative time in this novel, especially those in the last few chapters, which have make this part drift away from the main body of the story telling in this novel. Analysis on some astrology content in chapter 12 and chapter 39, this paper finds that there are two sets of narrative time in this novel. This can be explained as following ： first, during the process of composition, the author abandoned the original chronological narrative time in order to meet the chronology in Water Margin. Second, the existing of a narra- tive time which is different from the chronological time in Water Margin indicates that The Golden Lotus is not created on the base of Water Margin, rather, it is based on the blue print of another story and had then been implanted into Water Margin.

关 键 词：《金瓶梅词话》 叙事时间 生辰“八字” 占星 

分 类 号：I207.41[文学—中国文学]