日语限定副词与限定助词在双重限定句中的功能分析  

Analysis of the Functions of Japanese Restrictive Adverbs and Restrictive Auxiliary Verbs in Double Restrictive Sentences

作　　者：曹彦琳 

机构地区：[1]北京外国语大学网络与继续教育学院

出　　处：《日语学习与研究》2017年第6期25-33,共9页Journal of Japanese Language Study and Research

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目名称:现代日语中的双重限定表达--以限定副词和限定助词的共现句式为中心(项目批准号:2015JJ001);福建省社会科学规划项目青年项目<语法化视野下的日语复句句式变化研究>(主持人陈燕青;项目编号2014C018)的阶段性成果~~

摘　　要：本论文吸收焦点理论与情态学的研究成果,提出了两个语义分析标准,从结构与意义两个层面对限定副词和限定助词共现的双重限定句进行了探讨。结论指出,不管限定副词和限定助词在句中是否拥有相同的焦点和辖域,双方在语义上通常分别承担不同的功能,这一语义差异有可能体现在基本义上,也有可能体现在附加义的命题义或语气义上。本研究尝试性地解决了先行研究中少有涉猎的限定副词与限定助词在双重限定句中的功能分工问题。This paper is based on former study about focus theory and results of modality study, invents two standards for semantic analysis, and investigates double restrictive phrasing containing both restrictive auxiliary word and restrictive adverb in terms of structure as well as meaning. The paper concludes that regardless of whether restrictive auxiliary words and restrictive adverbs have the same focus and domain, they must assume different semantic functions. This difference may be manifested in the basic meaning, otherwise in a propositional meaning or modal meaning from an additional meaning. This paper resolves the necessity of double restrictive phrasing, which remains unsettled in the literature. It also clarifies assignments of functions for restrictive auxiliary words and restrictive adverbs in the sentence.

关 键 词：双重限定句 限定副词 限定助词 焦点 

分 类 号：H36[语言文字—日语]