关于高校公选课选课和结课考试的思考  

Some Thoughts on Course Selection and Final Examination of Public Elective Courses in Colleges and Universities

作　　者：姜伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国矿业大学(北京)资源与安全工程学院,北京100083

出　　处：《科教文汇》2018年第2期48-49,56,共3页Journal of Science and Education

基　　金：中国矿业大学(北京)本科教育教学改革与研究项目资助--<安全事故案例分析与启示>课程内容建设项目;项目编号:J170120

摘　　要：本文以某高校"安全事故案例分析"公选课为例,调研了选课与专业的关系、选课原因、结课考试方式三个方面,发现课程内容是学生选择课程的主要原因,并建议教师应该从课程内容设计和考勤两个方面加强课程内容建设。调研公选课选课和专业的关系,发现可能有关系,但是关系不大。关于结课考试,学生对公选课结课考试更喜欢提交论文和制作PPT这两种形式,占86%左右;闭卷和开卷考试两种考试形式学生选择率较低,占14%左右,通过研究四种考试形式的优缺点和工科专业课特点,公选课课程选择提交论文和制作PPT这两种结课方式更为合适。Taking the public elective course of ＂Case Analysis ofSafety Accidents＂ in a university as an example, this paper in-vestigates the following three aspects： the relationship betweenelective courses and majors, the reasons for choosing courses andthe ways of final examination. It is found that the content ofcourses is the main reason for students to choose courses, and itis suggested that teachers should strengthen the construction ofcurriculum contents from two aspectsof curriculum content design and at-tendance. By investigating the rela-tionship between public electivecourses and majors, it is found thatthey may be relevant, but not veryrelevant. In terms of the final exami-nation, students prefer research pa-per submission writing and PPTmaking, accounting for about 86%;the rate of choosing close-book andopen-book examinations is relatively low, accounting for about14%. By studying the advantages and disadvantages of the fourforms of examination and the characteristics of engineeringcourses, the writer holds that research paper submission and PPTmaking are more appropriate ways of final examination.

关 键 词：高校 公选课 选课 结课考试 

分 类 号：G642.47[文化科学—高等教育学]