论福斯特与奥康纳生态伦理的异质性  

On the Heterogeneity of Foster and O·Connor's Ecological Ethics

作　　者：孙全胜[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院当代中国研究所,北京100009

出　　处：《内蒙古民族大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第6期110-119,共10页Journal of Inner Mongolia Minzu University：Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"生命伦理的道德形态学研究"(项目编号:13ZD066);国家社会科学基金项目"当前中国道德现实问题研究"(项目编号:13ZDIXM001)

摘　　要：福斯特与奥康纳生态伦理在马克思生态观的理解、批判资本主义的角度和对理想社会的建构上有异质性。在对马克思生态观的理解上,福斯特坚持马克思思想中有丰富的生态伦理观点,并凭借物质交换断裂思想深化了马克思生态观。奥康纳则坚持马克思思想中存在自然维度的缺场,并希望建立文化唯物主义补充马克思主义;在资本主义批判的角度上,福斯特立足于物质交换断裂观点分析资本主义引起的生态危机,奥康纳则提出资本运作机制的双重矛盾来揭示资本增值和生态危机的关联;在对理想社会的建构上,福斯特期望推翻私有产权制度,建立劳动者自由联合的社会,奥康纳则期望消除资本运作机制,建立生态社会主义。福斯特和奥康纳的生态伦理能够帮助我们更好地认清资本主义导致的生态失衡,从而推进我国生态文明的建设。Foster and O·Connor's ecological ethics are heterogeneous in the understanding of Marx's ecological outlook,the critical capitalist perspective and the construction of ideal society.On the understanding of Marx's ecological view,Foster insists on the rich ecological ethics view in Marx's thought,and deepens the Marxist view of ecology with the material exchange and breaking thought.O·Connor insists on the absence of the natural dimension in Marx's thought and hopes to establish cultural materialism to supplement Marxism.In the point of view of capitalist critique,Foster is based on the material exchange rupture point of view of the ecological crisis caused by capitalism,in the construction of the ideal society,Foster expects to overthrow the private property system and establish a free society of laborers.O·Connor expects to eliminate capital.In the construction of the ideal society,Operational mechanism,the establishment of ecological socialism,Foster and O·Connor's ecological ethics can help us to better understand the ecological imbalance caused by capitalism,so as to promote the construction of ecological civilization in China.

关 键 词：福斯特 奥康纳 生态马克思主义 生态伦理 

分 类 号：B82-058[哲学宗教—伦理学]