检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川大学商学院 [2]四川农业大学商学院 [3]同济大学浙江学院经济与管理系
出 处:《南大商学评论》2017年第1期168-183,共16页Nanjing Business Review
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上资助项目:“企业社会责任行为对丑闻品牌形象的修复机理及策略体系研究”(编号:71372189)资助
摘 要:基于B2C平台搜索品和体验品分类视角,文章引入调节定向理论探究在线评论与消费体验正负面相一致或相矛盾情境下异质性消费者在线评论意愿的差异性。研究表明:(1)在线评论呈正面或负面性时,促进定向消费者在正面消费体验时总是比预防定向调节消费者的在线评论意愿更高,但预防定向消费者在负面消费体验时总是比促进定向消费者的在线评论意愿更高;(2)消费者正面或负面消费体验时,不同调节定向消费者对搜索品与体验品的在线评论意愿存在差异;(3)不同调节定向消费者对体验品的在线评论意愿差异程度都高于搜索品。基于研究发现,为商家有效管理在线评论工作提供理论依据与实践参考。Based on the category of search goods and experience goods on B2C platform, this research introduced regulatory focus theory to explore the difference in heterogeneous consumers' online comment intention between scenarios in which online comment and consuming experience agree with or contradict to each other. The research has shown: (1) When the consuming experience is positive, online comment intention of consumers with promotion focus is always higher than those with prevention focus, while in negative consuming experience, the online comment intention of consumers with prevention focus is always higher than those with promotion focus. (2) When positive or negative consumer experience, consumers with different regulatory focus have different online comment intention to search goods and experience goods. (3) Consumers with different regulatory focus have a stronger intention to comment on experience goods than search goods online. Finally this research provides theoretical evidence and practical reference for businesses to manage online comment effectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249