工具理性和底限正义:刑事速裁程序辩护的价值  

The Instrumental Rationality and the Basic Justice:the Value Dimension of Defense in the Criminal Speedy Trial Procedure

作　　者：李麒[1] 

机构地区：[1]山西大学法学院,山西太原030006

出　　处：《山西大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2018年第1期112-120,共9页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：刑事速裁程序以诉讼效率为导向,其一系列程序规则及其实践已经极大地改变了刑事普通程序的辩护样式,形成一种新的刑事辩护形态。工具理性和底限正义构成了刑事速裁程序辩护的价值维度。在工具理性价值法则的支配之下,刑事速裁程序不可能寻求完善的辩护;底限正义要求出于司法公正和预防错案之目的,刑事速裁程序应当坚守无罪推定原则,给被追诉人提供最基本的法律帮助。因此,刑事速裁程序既不能因为强调辩护权保障而嬗变为刑事普通程序,亦不能忽视辩护权而沦为行政治罪程序。在工具理性和底限正义价值维度的关照之下,可以就适用范围、上诉权等刑事速裁程序的立法问题提出见解。The criminal speedy trial procedure is based on the orientation of efficiency,and its series of procedural rules and practices have greatly changed the defense style of the criminal ordinary procedure,forming a new type of defense. The instrumental rationality and the basic justice constitute the value dimension of defense in the criminal speedy trial procedure. Under the control of the law of the rational value of the instrumental rationality,it is impossible to find a perfect defense in the criminal speedy trial procedure; For the purpose of judicial justice and prevention of misjudged cases,the basic justice entails adhering to the principle of presumption of innocence in the criminal speedy trial procedure. Therefore,the criminal speedy trial procedure should not evolve into the criminal ordinary procedure because of the emphasis on protection of the right to defense and should not descend to a kind of administrative punishment procedure because of neglect of the right to defense. Under the care of the instrumental rationality and the basic justice,we can put forward opinions on legislative problem about the criminal ordinary procedure including the scope of application,the right to appeal and so on.

关 键 词：刑事速裁程序 辩护 工具理性 底限正义 价值 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]