检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工程大学动力与能源工程学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150001
出 处:《应用科技》2017年第5期30-34,共5页Applied Science and Technology
基 金:国家科技支撑计划(2015BAG16B001)
摘 要:为了精确控制相继增压柴油机调速过程,在GT-power与MATLAB/Simulink联合仿真环境下,基于常规PID(proportion integration differentiation)和模糊自适应PID两种控制算法分别建立了TBD234V12型相继增压柴油机调速控制模型,进行仿真和对比研究,并将标定工况下气缸压力仿真值与实验值对比,验证了模型的准确性。结果表明,相较于经典PID算法,模糊自适应PID算法响应快、超调量少,控制效果较优。In order to precisely control the speed regulation process of a sequential turbocharging diesel engine,in the joint simulation environment of GT-power and MATLAB/SIMULINK,the speed regulation control models on TBD234 V12 sequential turbocharging diesel engine were respectively established on the basis of the classical PID and the fuzzy self-adapted PID( proportion integration differentiation) control algorithm. The simulation and the comparative research were carried out,in addition,the simulative value of the cylinder pressure under the declared working conditions were compared with the testing value,so as to verify the accuracy of the model. The simulation results show that the fuzzy self-adapted PID control algorithm has a better effect than the classical PID algorithm,including fast response,lower overshoot and better control effect.
关 键 词:柴油机 相继增压 调速 PID 模糊 控制 算法 仿真
分 类 号:TP273[自动化与计算机技术—检测技术与自动化装置]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7