检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏河[1]
机构地区:[1]深圳信息职业技术学院应用外语学院,广东深圳518172
出 处:《深圳信息职业技术学院学报》2017年第4期93-100,共8页Journal of Shenzhen Institute of Information Technology
摘 要:韩礼德(1994)和汤普森(2000)均认为,动词词组、动词词组复合体以及小句复合体之间的界限有时是模糊的。本文从功能句法角度分别对这三个概念进行比较,尝试运用被动化来修复小句复合体中want sb.to do这类嵌有逻辑主语并被认为是动词词组复合体的结构,使其重新具备典型动词词组复合体的特征,明晰上述概念的界限,并梳理动词词组和动词词组复合体的主要特征和结构模式,以便在对句子进行句法分析尤其及物性分析时能更清晰地定位"过程"类型及其顺序关系。Both Holliday (1994) and Thompson (2000) have proposed that the boundaries among verbal group, verbal group complex and clause complex could sometimes be blurred. This article tries to make comparisons between verbal group and verbal group complex, verbal group complex and clause complex respectively, and makes a proposal in which passivisation could be used to retrieve a typical verbal group complex from those structures that share similar pattern with want sb. to do which has a logical subject somebody embedded in between. By doing so this article tries to clarify the boundaries among those concepts mentioned above, to redisplay the main features and patterns of typical verbal groups and verbal group complexes in hope of defining the process and its sequence relation when making a syntactic analysis, especially a transitivity one.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38