检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘韵[1]
出 处:《大连理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第1期93-100,共8页Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社科基金项目:"法治中国视阈下的司法与政治关系研究"(14BFX002)
摘 要:当前,环境信访案件在内的环境维权异化方式与环境公益诉讼案件之间巨大的数量差,以及诉讼进程中出现的诸多新问题,表明环境公益诉讼并未达致其制度目的。政府、司法、社会间缺乏良性互动导致诉讼过程中的碎片化问题突出。对此,可以借鉴同心圆理论,即环境公益诉讼程序应建构以社会组织为主导,赋予公民、检察机关间接起诉权,行政机关适度参与的基本模式,在环境公益诉讼中实现多元化主体间的最优搭配,形成政府、司法、社会各守其位、各尽其责的立体治理模式。Currently,a huge difference exists between the alternative ways of environmental rights protection in environmental petition cases environmental public interest litigation cases,and many new problems arise in the course of litigation.This shows that environmental public interest litigation does not achieve its purpose.What's more,the lack of positive interaction among government,judiciary and society makes the fragmentation problems in the course of litigation more obvious.Drawing upon the concentric circle theory,this paper proposes that environmental public interest litigation should construct a basic model,wherein social organizations act as the leading power,citizens and procuratorial offices exercise the indirect right of prosecution and administrative offices may participate moderately.Thus,the optimal match between the diversified subjects can be achieved in the environmental public interest litigation,and a three-dimensional governance model can be formulated,wherein government,judiciary and society all take their places and fulfill their duties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222