论行政诉讼法学中的概念之争——以“司法审查”与“行政诉讼”之争为例  

On the Debate about Legal Conceptualization——Exemplified by “Judicial Examination” vs. “Administrative Litigation”

作　　者：余歌 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210046

出　　处：《广西科技师范学院学报》2018年第1期81-83,99,共4页Journal of Guangxi Science & Technology Normal University

摘　　要：20世纪90年代初,学界曾围绕我国的"行政诉讼"概念是否应当改称"司法审查"展开过争论。考察这场概念之争的产生原因及概念变迁的失败原因,不难发现,概念能否成功变迁与社会认同、交际成本以及是否有益于法律制度的实质改良等因素有关。认为法学研究只有不落概念之窠臼,多关注现实问题,才能充分体现理论研究的价值。The early 1990 s saw in the jurisprudential circle of China the debate over whether the concept of"administrative litigation"should be named"judicial examination"for a change. Through exploring the causes of the dispute and the failure of the conceptualization, it's not hard to conclude that the success of change in conceptualization involves such factors as social approval, communicative cost and its beneficial role on the improvement of legal system, etc. It is believed that only by focusing on reality issues rather than stereotyped conceptualization can the value of theoretical research be realized to the fullest.

关 键 词：司法审查 行政诉讼 概念之争 

分 类 号：D915.4[政治法律—诉讼法学]