检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈新桂[1] 谢容明[1] 魏文波[1] 江树嵩[1]
机构地区:[1]广东省揭阳市人民医院普外一区,广东揭阳522000
出 处:《中国当代医药》2018年第2期59-61,共3页China Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨腹腔镜结肠癌根治术与开腹手术治疗结肠癌的效果。方法采用盲选方法将2015年6月~2017年6月来本院就诊的100例结肠癌患者分为对照组(n=50)、研究组(n=50)。给予对照组开腹手术治疗,给予研究组腹腔镜结肠癌根治术。比较两组的临床效果。结果两组患者的手术时间、淋巴结清扫数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),研究组的术中出血量明显少于对照组,术后排气时间、住院时间、肠胃功能恢复时间均明显短于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组术后并发症发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论结肠癌患者施行腹腔镜结肠癌根治术的临床效果比传统开腹手术更显著,值得临床推广应用。Objective To explore the effect of laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer and laparotomy treating colon cancer.Methods 100 patients with colon cancer treated in our hospital from June 2015 to June 2017 were divided into the control group (n=50) and the study group (n=50) by blind selection method.The control group was treated with laparotomy,while the study group was treated with laparoseopic radical resection of colon cancer.Clinical effect between the two groups was compared.Results The operation time,lymph nodes were compared between the two groups had no difference (P〉0.05).The intraoperative blood loss in the study group was significantly fewer than that in the control group,postoperative exhaust time,hospitalization time and gastrointestinal function recovery time in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P〈0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P〈0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of laparoscopie radical resection of colon cancer is more significant than that of laparotomy,and it is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.225