介入溶栓术治疗急性闭塞性脑梗死的效果观察  

Observation on the Effect of Interventional Thrombolysis in the Treatment of Acute Occlusive Cerebral Infarction

作　　者：张广智[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省茂名市人民医院,广东茂名525000

出　　处：《临床医学工程》2018年第1期73-74,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering

摘　　要：目的观察介入溶栓术治疗急性闭塞性脑梗死的效果。方法选取我院2015年5月至2016年5月收治的急性闭塞性脑梗死患者89例,分为两组。对照组(40例)接受常规治疗,观察组(49例)在对照组基础上采用介入溶栓术治疗。比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果治疗后,两组患者的NSS评分均低于治疗前,且观察组的NSS评分显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组的总有效率为89.80%,明显高于对照组的62.50%(P<0.05)。两组患者的并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论常规治疗联合介入溶栓术治疗急性闭塞性脑梗死能够明显提高患者的临床疗效,减轻患者的痛苦,提高生活质量,值得临床推广应用。Objective To observe the effect of interventional thrombolysis in the treatment of acute occlusive cerebral infarction. Methods 89 cases of patients with acute occlusive cerebral infarction admitted to our hospital from May 2015 to May 2016 were selected and divided into two groups. The control group （40 cases） received routine therapy, while the observation group （49 cases） received interventional thrombolysis on the basis of the control group. The treatment effect was compared between the two groups. Results After treatment, the NSS scores of the two groups were lower than those before treatment, and the NSS score of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group, with statistical differences （P 〈0.05）. The total effective rate of the observation group was 89.80%, significantly higher than 62.50% of the control group （P 〈0.05）. No statistical difference was found in the incidence of complications between the two groups （P〉0.05）. Conclusions Routine therapy combined with interventional thrombolysis in the treatment of acute occlusive cerebral infarction can significantly improve patients＇ clinical curative effect, relieve the pain and improve the quality of life, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

关 键 词：介入溶栓术 急性闭塞性脑梗死 疗效 

分 类 号：R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]