检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李奎[1]
机构地区:[1]四川省广元市中心医院,628000
出 处:《实用癌症杂志》2018年第2期217-220,共4页The Practical Journal of Cancer
摘 要:目的探讨薄型股前外侧皮瓣修复舌癌术后软组织缺损的效果。方法选取90例舌癌术后软组织缺损部软组织缺损患者,根据修复方法的不同分为薄型股前外侧皮瓣、前臂桡侧游离皮瓣、小腿内侧游离皮瓣各30例。皮瓣切取平均面积为(1.2×1.5)cm^2^(1.8×2.5)cm^2,比较3种手术方式的有效率及舌癌术后软组织缺损修复的满意度。结果 3种手术方式有效率间没有明显差异,无统计学意义(P=0.075);薄型股前外侧皮瓣修复舌癌术后软组织缺损满意度明显优于其他方法,具有统计学意义(P=0.069)。结论对舌癌术后软组织缺损部软组织缺损患者采用不同部位的游离皮瓣修复均取得了良好的修复效果,其中薄型股前外侧皮瓣修复满意度明显高于其他方法,提高患者的康复效果。Objective To investigate the effect of thin anterolateral thigh flap tongue cancer soft tissue defects after surgery. Methods 90 tongue cancer patients with soft tissue defects after surgery were divided into 3 groups : the anterolateral femoral flap,the forearm radial free flap and the calf medial free flap. The average area of the flap was ( 1.2 × 1.5 ) cm^2 - ( 1.8 × 2.5 ) cm^2 , and the satisfaction rate of the 3 surgical methods and the satisfaction of the postoperative soft tissue defect repair were compared. Results There was no significant difference in efficiency among the 3 kinds of surgery;thin anterolateral thigh flap tongue cancer and soft tissue defect satisfaction was significantly better than other methods, there had statistical difference. Conclusion Tongue cancer soft tissue defects with different parts of the free flap repair have achieved good results,in which the thin anterolateral thigh flap satisfaction is significantly higher than other methods in improving the rehabilitation of patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.22.159