检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南昌大学法学院,江西南昌330047 [2]广东省东莞市中级人民法院,广东东莞511700
出 处:《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2002年第3期69-73,共5页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
摘 要:专家证据是随着科技进步而广泛运用的证据形式。英美法系国家的专家证人制度将专家视为一种特殊证人较有特色。专家证人以鉴定结论或专家意见等多种形式向法庭提供证据 ,强调专家证人的公正性、独立性 ,通过交叉询问进行审查。而我国专家证据仅有鉴定结论一种形式 ,既不科学 ,又不能满足实际需要。借鉴英美国家的经验与教训 ,建立我国以鉴定结论为主。Expert testimony system is a widely used testimony form of the result of modern science and technology development.In Britain and America,the practice that they view experts as special witnesses is new to us.Expert witnesses offer testimony to the court by various forms,including experts' report,suggestions,etc.,focusing on the justice and independence and making investigation through cross-examination.In China,we only accept the experts' report.It can neither be scientific nor meet the reality.Based on the practice in Britain and America,we must perfect our expert testimony system with experts' conclusion as the main testimony and their suggestions as a complementary.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28