检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯冠男[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏省苏州市立医院东区妇产科,江苏苏州215001
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2017年第36期62-63,共2页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的对经腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剥除术和经腹子宫肌瘤剥除术进行分析。方法选取122例子宫肌瘤患者,按随机数字法分为观察组与对照组,每组各61例;其中对照组患者采用经腹子宫肌瘤剥除术,观察组采用经腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剥除术,对比两组治疗效果。结果观察组患者术中出血量少于对照组患者,且观察组患者预后效果优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剥除术术中出血量较少。Objective To analyze the laparoscopic hysteromyomectomy and transabdominal myomectomy. Methods 122 cases of uterine fbroids were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group, 61 cases in each group. The control group was treated by abdominal myomectomy and the observation group was treated by laparoscopic myomectomy. The therapeutic effect of the two groups was compared. Results The intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was signifcantly lower than those in the control group, and the prognosis in the observation group was better than that in the control group, the difference was statistically signifcant (P〈0.05). Conclusion The amount of bleeding in the laparoscopic hysteromyomectomy is less.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229