俄国形式主义文论“节奏”概念的知识学探讨  

the Study of the Concept of "Rhythm" in Russian Formalism Using the Research Method of the Knowledge Theory

作　　者：吴未意[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]宜春学院文学与新闻传播学院,江西宜春336000 [2]四川大学文学与新闻学院,四川成都610064

出　　处：《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2018年第1期104-106,共3页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：学界极少关注俄国形式主义文论的"节奏"研究,以知识界"可欲的"知识学态度、知识谱系学方法考察俄国形式主义文论"节奏"概念的谱系构型,发现俄国形式主义文论一反传统诗学,将"节奏"提升至诗学的中心地位,尤其是勃里克反对传统诗学将节奏作为存在者,等同于音节的观点,将节奏作为存在,与音节相区别,由此发现了俄国诗歌发展的内在规律及俄国现代诗歌的发展趋向,其将节奏与语义统一的观点,纠正了传统诗学与未来派及俄国形式主义早期偏执一端的弊病。俄国形式主义的节奏研究为节奏理论以及诗学做出了重大贡献。The study of the ＂ rhythm＂ of Russian Formalism is rarely studied in academia. Using the attitude of knowledge theorywhich is＂ desire＂ by intellectual circles and the method of knowledge genealogy to study the genealogy of the concept of ＂ rhythm＂ inRussian Formalism, we can discover that Russian formalist literary theory elevates the ＂ rhythm＂ to the central position of poetics whichis different from the traditional poetics. In particular, Brickle is opposed to the traditional poetics in which the＂ rhythm＂ is regarded asa existent and is equivalent of the syllable. Brickle takes the rhythm as being which is different from the syllable and on this basis hefinds the inherent law of the development of Russian poetry and the development trend of Russian modern poetry. Furthermore, Brickleunifies the rhythm and the semantics which corrected the shortcomings of traditional poetics and futurists and the early Russian formalism. The rhythmic study of Russian formalism has made a great contribution to the rhythm theory and poetics.

关 键 词：俄国形式主义文论 节奏 知识学 音节 

分 类 号：I512.06[文学—其他各国文学]