检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:洪浩[1] 程光 HONG Hao;CHENG Guang(School of Law, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 43007)
出 处:《山东警察学院学报》2017年第6期14-22,共9页Journal of Shandong Police College
摘 要:我国检察机关的撤回公诉行为具有任意性。按照尊重和保障人权原则的要求,同时基于一事不再理原则和禁止双重危险原则,刑事再审案件的启动或者说一个独立的刑事之诉的再次启动,必须有利于犯罪嫌疑人或者被告人,因此有必要对我国人民检察院任意撤回公诉的做法进行一定程度的限制。通过对现行刑事诉讼法以及相关司法解释的分析,辅之以相关诉讼法理,可以看出我国撤回公诉制度中存在若干问题,针对这些问题需要根据法理和司法实践需要进行必要的完善。There is an optional nature of public prosecution withdrawal among China' s procuratorial organs. In accordance with requirements of principles of respecting and safeguarding human rights, based on principle of non bis in idem and prohibition against double jeopardy, the initiation of criminal retrial case or restart of a dependent criminal litigation should be beneficial to criminal suspects or defendants, therefore, it is necessary to limit practice of randomly withdrawing public prosecution by the people~ procuratorate in China to some extent. Some problems can be found out in China' s public prosecution withdrawal system through analysis of the existing criminal procedure law and relevant judicial interpretations combined with some related legal principles. We shall make some necessary improvement according to the need of legal principles and judicial practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.219.125