检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁丰 霍文璟[1] 欧阳刚[2] 季鹏[2] 王尊 王磊[3] 叶祥明[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江省人民医院,杭州医学院附属人民医院,浙江杭州市310014 [2]江苏省省级机关医院,江苏南京市210024 [3]南京中医药大学,江苏南京市210029
出 处:《中国康复理论与实践》2018年第2期208-213,共6页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
基 金:全国高校博士点基金项目(No.20123237120008)
摘 要:目的探究有氧运动和有氧运动联合抗阻训练对慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者肌力、心肺耐力等运动功能的影响。方法 2015年7月至2016年8月,CKD患者60例随机分为对照组(n=20)、有氧运动组(n=20)和有氧联合抗阻训练组(n=20)。有氧运动组以50%峰值摄氧量(VO2peak)踏功率自行车,每次30 min。有氧运动联合抗阻训练组在有氧运动组基础上,进行弹力带抗阻训练。每周3次,共12周。比较三组间训练前后上下肢一次最大重复负荷(1 RM)、心肺运动试验(CPET)、手臂弯曲试验(ACT)、30秒坐站试验(CS-30)和6分钟步行试验(6MWT)的差异,并监测训练前后患者血肌酐(sCr)和肾小球滤过率(e GFR)的变化。结果训练前三组间各指标均无显著性差异(F<1.841,P>0.05)。训练后,有氧运动组和有氧联合抗阻训练组在各指标方面均改善(t>2.162,P<0.05),且优于对照组(t>2.132,P<0.05);有氧联合抗阻训练组在上肢1 RM、下肢1 RM、VO_(2peak)、ACT、CS-30和6MWT方面均优于有氧运动组(t>2.081,P<0.05)。结论有氧运动可改善CKD患者运动功能,联合抗阻训练效果更好。Objective To observe the effects of aerobic training and aerobic combined with resistance training on motor function,like muscle strength, cardiopulmonary endurance and so on, in patients with chronic kidney disease(CKD).Methods From July, 2015 to August, 2016, 60 patients with CKD were randomly divided into control group(A, n=20),aerobic training group(B, n=20) and aerobic combined with resistance training group(C, n=20). Group B performed cycle ergometer at 50% peak oxygen uptake(VO_(2peak)) for 30 minutes a time, and group C performed one section of Thera-Band resistance training based on group B, three times a week for twelve weeks. All patients were evaluated with one repetition maximum-upper limb(1 RM-U), one repetition maximum-lower limb(1 RM-L), Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test(CPET), Arm Curl Test(ACT), 30-second Chair Stand(CS-30), Six-Minute Walk Test(6 MWT), and estimated gomerular filtration rate(e GFR) and serum creatinine(s Cr) were calculated and recorded before and after training.Results There was no significant difference in all indexes among three groups before training(F<1.841, P>0.05). After training, all indexes improved in groups B and C(t>2.162, P<0.05), and were better in groups B and C than in group A(t>2.132, P<0.05). After training, 1 RM-U, 1 RM-L, VO_(2peak), ACT, CS-30 and 6 MWT were better in group C than in group B(t>2.081, P<0.05).Conclusion Aerobic training could improve the motor function of patients with CKD, and it is more effective combined with resistance training.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38