检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐峰 李涛[2] 胡昊 徐彬[2] 谭林英 张建[2] 伍博宇 席金涛
机构地区:[1]解放军武汉总医院,湖北武汉430000 [2]湖北中医药大学研究生院,湖北武汉430070
出 处:《中国矫形外科杂志》2018年第3期260-265,共6页Orthopedic Journal of China
基 金:基金项目:湖北省自然科学基金项目(编号:2014CFB473;WJ2017H0033)
摘 要:[目的]探讨椎间孔镜Ⅰ SEE技术治疗腰椎管狭窄合并腰椎间盘突出症的近期疗效。[方法]回顾性分析2017年1月~2017年3月于本院应用椎间孔镜Ⅰ SEE技术治疗并获得随访的10例腰椎管狭窄合并腰椎间盘突出症患者的临床资料,采用视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale/score,VAS)评估手术疗效,应用日本骨科协会(Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores,JOA)评分对腰椎功能进行评估,并计算JOA改善率。[结果]手术时间60~110min,平均88 min;出血量5~20 ml,平均11.5 ml;住院时间3~7 d,平均5.4 d。所有患者随访3~6个月,平均4.5个月。术前VAS评分为(8.10±0.61)分,术后3 d VAS评分为(2.81±0.40)分,末次随访为(1.44±0.28)分。术前与术后3 d、末次随访比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术前JOA评分为(7.93±0.73)分,出院当天评分为(18.73±0.91)分,末次随访评分为(31.16±1.10)分,术前与出院时、末次随访比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。根据JOA评分标准计算改善率,优8例,良1例,可1例,差0例。[结论]应用椎间孔镜I see技术治疗腰椎管狭窄合并腰椎间盘突出症疗效确切,具有创伤小、手术时间短、恢复快、术后并发症少等优点。[Objective] To explore the short-term outcome of technique 1 see of PELD in treatment of lumbar disc hernia- tion and stenosis. [Methods] The clinical data of 10 patients treated with technique 1 see of PELD for lumbar spinal stenosis combined with lumbar disc herniation were retrospectively analyzed from January 2017 to March 2017 in our hospital. The visu- al analogue scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores (JOA) was used for evaluation of the outcome. [Results] The operation in the 10 patients lasted for 60-110 minutes (88 minutes on average), associated with blood loss from 5 to 20 ml (11.5 ml on average), hospital stay from 3 to 7d, (5.4 d on average). All patients were followed for 3-6 months, with an average of 4.5 months. The VAS significantly decreased from (8.10±0.61) ploperatively to (2.81+0.40) at 3 days after surgery, further to (1.44±0.28) at the latest follow-up (P〈0.05). By contrast, the JOA score significantly increased from (7.93±0.73) preoperative- ly, to (18.73±0.91) at the discharged day, further to (31.16±1.10) at the latest follow up (P〈0.05). In term of JOA improved rate, the results were graded as excellent in 8, good in 1, fair in 1 and poor in 0. [Conclusion] Application of technique I see of PEID for treatment of lumbar disc herniation and stenosis is effective, with advantages of minimized trauma, shortened operation time, quicker recovery and less postoperative complications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15