检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:武斌
机构地区:[1]安徽师范大学马克思主义学院,安徽芜湖241002
出 处:《青岛农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第1期60-63,共4页Journal of Qingdao Agricultural University(Social Science)
摘 要:为了驳斥其他哲学家对因果关系的肯定,休谟在《人类理智研究》中从经验论的视角对因果关系的非真性进行了论证。这体现了这位思想家对于认识论的深刻洞察,同时也为后世研究者提供了丰富的思考空间。休谟从经验论和普遍性两个角度论证了因果关系的非真性,人类认识到的只是惯性。但是,因果关系对于人而言又有其必要性,是人认识和实践的必要前提。正确地认识因果关系对我们的认识和实践是具有启示价值的。In order to refute other philosophers' affirmation of the causality relationship,Hume argued from the perspective of empiricism in An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.This reflects that the thinker not only has the profound insight into epistemology,but also provides a wealth of thinking space for the researchers in the future generations.Hume demonstrated the non-authenticity of the causality relationship from the two perspectives of empiricism and universality,and also argued that what human beings recognized was inertia only.However,for human beings,the causality relationship also played the role of necessity,which was the necessary prerequisite for human understanding and practice.It is of great enlightenment for our understanding and practice to understand the causality relationship correctly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.203.127