论后殖民生态批评——后殖民批评困境突围与生态策略  

Postcolonial Ecocriticism: How to Go Further and What Is Its Ecological Strategy

作　　者：江玉琴 

机构地区：[1]深圳大学文学院

出　　处：《鄱阳湖学刊》2018年第1期65-75,共11页Journal of Poyang Lake

基　　金：广东省研究生教育创新计划项目"比较文学"(0000050814)

摘　　要：当前后殖民生态批评的讨论聚焦在其起源、概念和构建原则的梳理上,忽视了其中后殖民理论转向生态批评的前提条件和必然趋势。后殖民批评的生态转向既反映了21世纪后殖民批评的发展困境与现状,也是由后殖民批评本身所具有的跨学科特性所决定的。后殖民批评的生态转向标志为三个方面:后殖民理论关键词条中对生态环境术语的引介、后殖民理论中对生态帝国主义批判的强调以及后殖民环境建构。后殖民批评的生态策略,在于提出了全球主义话语下后殖民批评与生态批评的对话,更强调了以历史视角重新审视全球环境问题,理解环境政治与环境正义,同时以人类环境整体视角审视后殖民文学地方意识。Postcolonial ecocriticism currently focuses on its origin, concept and principle of construction but ignores the prerequisites and inevitable trend in the process of postcolonial intervention into ecocriticism.The eco-trend of postcolonialism not only mirrors the dilemma and status quo of postcolonial criticism in the 21 th century, but also reflects the decisive factor of interdisciplinary characteristic in postcolonial criticism itself. There are three signs for postcolonial intervention into ecocriticism. First, Bill Ashcroft's introduction of eco-concepts into postcolonial key concepts; second, Graham Huggan's new eco-imperial criticism; third, Mukherjee's construction for postcolonial environment. The ecological strategy of postcolonial criticism is that it calls for dialogues between postcolonial criticism and ecocriticism in the discourse of globalization, emphasizes the historical perspective of redefining environmental problems to better understand environmental politics and justice, and invites a holistic view to restudy the local consciousness in postcolonial literature.

关 键 词：后殖民批评 生态转向 后殖民生态批评 生态策略 

分 类 号：X2[环境科学与工程—环境科学]