国外康德先天综合判断的第三者问题研究述评  

A Discussion and Assessment on Problem of Kant's Third Thing of Synthetic Judgement A Priori in Foreign Academic Circles

作　　者：彭志君 水丽蓉 

机构地区：[1]衡阳师范学院法学院,湖南衡阳421002 [2]南华大学马克思主义学院,湖南衡阳421001

出　　处：《衡阳师范学院学报》2018年第1期62-67,共6页Journal of Hengyang Normal University

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"康德道义论重大理论和实践问题研究"(13JJD720007);衡阳师范学院博士科研启动项目"康德先天综合判断的第三者问题研究"(15B16);衡阳市社会科学基金项目"康德知识学的第三者理论研究"(2016D140)阶段性成果

摘　　要：国外学术界关于先天综合判断的第三者问题的研究涉及到康德的理论哲学和实践哲学两大领域。关于理论哲学中的第三者问题,国外学术界形成了混合型和先天型两种研究思路。在实践哲学中,则主要集中在对定言命令的第三者问题的研究上。国外学术界关于第三者问题的研究呈现出趋同化、细致性的特征,同时存在着对一些具体而重要的问题研究不够、研究缺乏系统性、忽视了某些领域的第三者问题和始终没有出现专门的研究成果等不足。国外学术界关于该问题的研究对我们强化哲学问题意识和导向,把握康德哲学的总问题和体系特征,以及从事西方哲学史的教育教学等都具有重要的理论和现实意义。The research of the third thing of problem of synthetic judgment a priori in foreign academic circles is related to two fields of Kant's theoretical and practical philosophy.With regard to the third thing of problem in theoretical philosophy,the foreign academic circles have formed the two types of research track,i.e.hybrid and a priori.The research of the third thing of problem in practical philosophy mainly focuses on the problen third thing of the categorical imperative,and formed a priori research track.The research of the third thing of problem in foreign academic circles shows the characteristics of elaborating and assimilation,but there are also some important and specific problems,which is to be researched not enough,lacking system,ignoring certain areas of the third thing of problem and not coming into specialized results so far.The research on this issue in foreign academic circles has important theoretical and practical significance for us,because it help strengthen the consciousness and guidance of philosophical problems,grasp the general problems and system characteristics of Kant's philosophy,and engage in the education and teaching of the history of western philosophy.

关 键 词：康德 先天综合判断 第三者 述评 

分 类 号：B516.31[哲学宗教—外国哲学]