揿针配合埋线治疗缺血性脑卒中后手功能障碍的效果  

The observations of clinical efficacy of press-needle combining thread embedding on treating patients with hand dysfunction after ischemic stroke

作　　者：谈慧[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州市第十二人民医院康复医学科,广东广州510620

出　　处：《中国医药导报》2018年第5期76-79,88,共5页China Medical Herald

摘　　要：目的观察揿针配合埋线治疗缺血性脑卒中后手功能障碍的效果。方法选取2015年1月~2016年12月在广州市第十二人民医院康复医学科和神经内科就诊的缺血性脑卒中后手功能障碍患者60例作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组,每组各30例。治疗组在常规治疗方案基础上,采用揿针配合埋线;对照组在常规治疗方案基础上,采用揿针配合功能针。均采用简式Fugl-Meyer运动功能评定量表(FMA)及Barthel指数评定量表(BI)进行治疗前后的效果评定并比较。结果治疗后,两组FMA评分和BI评分均优于治疗前(P<0.05),且治疗组优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在常规治疗方案基础上,揿针配合埋线比揿针配合功能针对缺血性脑卒中后手功能障碍的疗效更好。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of press-needle combine thread embedding on treating patients with hand dysfunction after isehemie stroke. Methods From January 2015 to December 2016, 60 patients with hand dysfunction after ischemic stroke in Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Neurology of Guangzhou Twelfth people＇s Hospital were selected as research objects, and divided into treatment group and control group by random number table, with 30 cases in each group. The treatment group was treated by press-needle combined thread embedding on the basis of routine treatment, and the control group was treated by press-needle combined functional acupuncture on the basis of routine treatment. The curative effect was evaluated and compared before and after treatment by the Fugl- Meyer Assessment （FMA） and the Barthel Index （BI）. Results After treatment, the FMA score and BI score in both group were all higher than before treatment （P 〈 0.05）, and the treatment group was better than control group, the difference was statistically significant （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion Based on routine treatment, the treatment of press-needle combined thread embedding is better than press-needle combined functional acupuncture on treating patients with hand dysfunction after ischemic stroke.

关 键 词：缺血性脑卒中 手功能障碍 揿针 埋线 

分 类 号：R743.31[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]