检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵紫竹 卫勇 张乃迁 常若葵 吴海云 刘华 单慧勇 杨仁杰 郭小英
机构地区:[1]天津农学院工程技术学院,天津300384 [2]Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department.Kansas State University,Manhattan KS 66502,USA
出 处:《中国乳品工业》2018年第2期45-48,共4页China Dairy Industry
基 金:天津市自然科学基金项目(13JCYBJC25700和14JCY-BJC30400);天津农学院高校教师教育改革创新引导发展项目(20170201);天津农学院高校教师教育改革创新引导发展项目(20170707).
摘 要:以牛奶中脂肪质量浓度的检测为研究对象,应用图像处理技术分析高光谱数据,选取样品分析区域,提取分析区域的平均光谱,建立了PLS、N-PLS预测模型对牛奶中脂肪质量浓度进行分析。结果表明,PLS预测模型中校正集与预测集的相关系数分别为0.9851和0.9913,而N-PLS预测模型中校正集与预测集的相关系数分别为0.9999和0.9976。两个模型对比发现,N-PLS模型预测精度高于PLS模型,尤其是牛奶中脂肪质量浓度较少的情况。In this paper, the detection of fat content in milk was studied. The image processing technology was used to select the sample area, and the average spectrum was extracted. The PLS and N-PLS prediction model were established to analyze the fat content in milk. The re- suits showed that the correlation coefficients between the calibration set and the prediction set in the PLS prediction model were 0.9851 and 0.9913 respectively, and the correlation coefficients between the calibration set and the prediction set in the N-PLS prediction model were 0.9999 and 0.9976 respectively. The accuracy of N-PLS model was higher than that of PLS model, especially in the case of low fat in milk.
分 类 号:TS252.7[轻工技术与工程—农产品加工及贮藏工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13