检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘桂强
机构地区:[1]武汉大学法学院
出 处:《北京仲裁》2017年第4期35-47,共13页Beijing Arbitration Quarterly
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大研究课题“一带一路倡议与法律合作研究”(16JJD820009)中期成果之一
摘 要:中煤能源案涉及仲裁裁决执行阶段国有企业的官方豁免问题。在该案中,无论是根据我国中央政府的声明还是依据香港普通法的实践,均否认了中煤能源公司的官方豁免主张。该案的意义在于为中国香港特别行政区法院提供了确认官方豁免主体资格的方法,明确了从事商业活动的国有企业不能享有官方豁免权。从短期来看,中煤能源案使国有企业失去了豁免主体资格这一名义优势地位,但从长远来看,该案的判决结果有利于我国国有企业以平等市场主体的身份参与海外竞争,有利于充分发挥国有企业在“一带一路”倡议下的主力军作用。TNB Fuel Services v. China National Coal Group ration touches upon the issue of PRC state-owned enterprises' assertion of crown immunity in the enforcement of arbitral award. Corpo- ( SOE ) In this case, China National Coal Group's assertion of crown immunity was re- jected by Hong Kong Court of First Instance (CFI) and the Central People's Government. This case provides insights on the issue of whether PRC SOEs with mainly commercial activities would be able to invoke Crown immunity and on the approach of Hong Kong courts in dealing such claims. Although the SOE's nominal advantage regarding the assertion of crown immunity was deprived of by the CFI, this case ensures the SOEs can participate in overseas competition as an equal market entity, and fully take advantage of its role as the major driving force under the One Belt One Road Initiative.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15