民事诉讼视角下虚假仲裁的规制——以我国司法实践为切入点  

False Litigation Regulation from the Perspective of Civil Litigation——Take Judicial Practice as the Entry point

作　　者：宋春龙[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《北京仲裁》2017年第4期87-104,共18页Beijing Arbitration Quarterly

摘　　要：我国在虚假仲裁的理论研究上尚显薄弱。案例分析表明，司法实践中鲜有直接认定虚假仲裁的判例，否认仲裁裁决效力成为规制虚假仲裁的唯一方式。处于防御地位的案外人在对抗虚假仲裁裁决上手段明显不足，而处理虚假仲裁的程序则处于供给不足状态。虚假仲裁范围模糊、司法对仲裁监督有限性、举证与取证手段不足、人民法院与仲裁委投入不足成为虚假仲裁规制难的原因。应建立有限的仲裁第三人制度，确立独立的撤销仲裁裁决之诉并辅之以中间判决制度来规制虚假仲裁问题。The Study on false arbitration is weak. The analysis of case shows that the judge refuses to affirm false arbitration. Instead they only restrict the arbitration effect. The persons not involved in arbitration has little weapon to fight with the false arbitration. The procedure for false arbitration is apparently insufficient. The reason why the regulation of false arbitration is so difficult is that, the range of the false is too vague, the limitation of judge on arbitration, the means of proof is too poor, the court and arbitration commission fail to invest sufficient re- source. We should establish limited third party in arbitration, build the setting aside of the arbitral award sue and apply for the Interlocutory Judg- ment.

关 键 词：虚假仲裁 执行力 仲裁第三人 中间判决 

分 类 号：D925.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]