世界一流学科是如何形成的——基于斯坦福大学和加州大学伯克利分校工程学科的比较  

How to be a World-class Academic Discipline?——A Comparison of Engineering Disciplines of Stanford University and University of California Berkeley

作　　者：孟照海[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国教育科学研究院,北京100088

出　　处：《比较教育研究》2018年第3期70-76,共7页International and Comparative Education

基　　金：中国教育科学研究院2016年度基本科研业务费专项资金重点项目"‘双一流’建设的挑战与应答"(课题批准号:GYB2016011)的研究成果

摘　　要：20世纪40年代后,斯坦福大学的工科之所以能够迅速超越加州大学伯克利分校,就在于:在学科发展方向上更加符合知识演进的趋势,在学科发展战略上更加聚焦,在学科资源获取方式上更加多元,在学科制度环境上得益于斯坦福大学的应用传统和简化的组织结构。推进世界一流学科建设,需要发挥学术企业家的关键引领作用,遵循学科发展的内在逻辑,抢占学科知识前沿,并构建有利的大学制度环境。The engineering discipline of Stanford University has quickly surpassed its companion of University of California Berkeley since 1940＇ s. Its success is made by such strategies as setting a discipline orientation in accordance with knowledge development trend, more focused discipline development strategy, more diverse accesses to resources, and conducive institutional niche of utility-oriented tradition and simplified structure of Stanford University. To push forward world-class discipline initiative, it is required to play a critical role by academic entrepreneur, conforming to intrinsic logic of discipline development, taking first step on cutting-edge area of discipline, and constructing a favorable institutional system.

关 键 词：学科方向 学科战略 制度环境 

分 类 号：G649.712[文化科学—高等教育学]