机构地区:[1]Department of Ophthalmology, Chosun University School of Medicine
出 处:《International Journal of Ophthalmology(English edition)》2018年第2期256-261,共6页国际眼科杂志(英文版)
基 金:Supported by Research Fund from Chosun University,2016
摘 要:AIM: To examine the thickness of the ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer(GCIPL) in eyes with resolved macular edema(ME) in non-ischemic central retinal vein occlusion(CRVO), applying spectral-domain optical coherence tomography(SD-OCT), and its relationship with visual acuity.METHODS: The retrospective observational case-control study included 30 eyes of non-ischemic CRVO patients with resolved ME(ME eyes) after treatment, and 30 eyes of non-ischemic CRVO patients without ME(non-ME eyes). The macular GCIPL thickness, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer(p RNFL) thickness and central macular thickness(CMT) were measured on a SD-OCT scan. Linear regression analyses were performed to determine the correlation between the thickness of each and the visual acuity(VA).RESULTS: No significant difference in average GCIPL thickness, mean pR NFL thickness and CMT were observed between ME group and non-ME group(P=0.296, 0.183, 0.846). But, minimum GCIPL thickness was reduced in ME eyes compared with non-ME eyes(P=0.022). Final VA significantly correlated with the minimum GCIPL thickness in ME eyes(r=-0.482, P=0.007), whereas no correlation was found with average GCIPL thickness, average pR NFL thickness and mean CMT.CONCLUSION: Minimum GCIPL thickness is reduced in ME eyes compared with non-ME eyes, and correlated with the VA in non-ischemic CRVO. These results propose that inner retinal damage occurring in patients with ME secondary to non-ischemic CRVO may lead to permanent visual defect after treatment.AIM: To examine the thickness of the ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer(GCIPL) in eyes with resolved macular edema(ME) in non-ischemic central retinal vein occlusion(CRVO), applying spectral-domain optical coherence tomography(SD-OCT), and its relationship with visual acuity.METHODS: The retrospective observational case-control study included 30 eyes of non-ischemic CRVO patients with resolved ME(ME eyes) after treatment, and 30 eyes of non-ischemic CRVO patients without ME(non-ME eyes). The macular GCIPL thickness, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer(p RNFL) thickness and central macular thickness(CMT) were measured on a SD-OCT scan. Linear regression analyses were performed to determine the correlation between the thickness of each and the visual acuity(VA).RESULTS: No significant difference in average GCIPL thickness, mean pR NFL thickness and CMT were observed between ME group and non-ME group(P=0.296, 0.183, 0.846). But, minimum GCIPL thickness was reduced in ME eyes compared with non-ME eyes(P=0.022). Final VA significantly correlated with the minimum GCIPL thickness in ME eyes(r=-0.482, P=0.007), whereas no correlation was found with average GCIPL thickness, average pR NFL thickness and mean CMT.CONCLUSION: Minimum GCIPL thickness is reduced in ME eyes compared with non-ME eyes, and correlated with the VA in non-ischemic CRVO. These results propose that inner retinal damage occurring in patients with ME secondary to non-ischemic CRVO may lead to permanent visual defect after treatment.
关 键 词:central retinal vein occlusion ganglion cellinner plexiform layer optical coherence tomography
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...