检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王宇倩
机构地区:[1]重庆邮电大学网络空间安全与信息法学院,重庆南岸400065
出 处:《乐山师范学院学报》2018年第2期111-120,共10页Journal of Leshan Normal University
摘 要:医疗行为与损害结果之间是否存在因果关系的认定是医疗纠纷案件的关键要素。目前各国关于因果关系的认定采用不同的标准,而我国主要依靠医疗鉴定。但是"二元化"的鉴定模式导致我国因果关系的认定存在重复鉴定、鉴定意见被质疑以及当事人滥用异议权等问题,因此,应当采取建立"一元化"鉴定模式、创建医学专家鉴定资料库等措施保证因果关系认定的科学性。医疗鉴定意见在案件的审理中并非唯一证据,只是顺利解决医疗纠纷的一项关键证据,对其进行严格的质证,保证其科学性、公正性十分有必要。Whether there is causal relationship betw een medical behaviors and damage result is the key element of medical dispute cases.At present,different countries adopt different standards for the identification of causality,and China mainly applies medical identification.However,the dual identification model leads to the repeated identification of the causal relationship,the doubt of the expert opinion,the abuse of the right of dissent by the parties and other problems.Therefore,measures should be taken to establish a unified identification model and establish a medical expert identification database to ensure the scientificity of causal relationship identification.Medical expert opinion is not the only evidence in the trial of the case,but it serves as a key evidence to solve the medical dispute smoothly.Thus,it is necessary to carry out strict cross examination to ensure its scientificity and impartiality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13