论疑罪从无原则在刑事审判中的有效适用——基于陈传钧案的裁判逻辑和理念  

On the Effective Application of the Suspect Crime from the Non-principle in the Criminal Trial——The Logic and Concept of Referee Based on the Case of Ch EN Chuanjun

作　　者：拜荣静[1] 王伟 

机构地区：[1]兰州大学法学院,甘肃兰州730000 [2]山东众城清泰(济南)律师事务所,山东济南250002

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2018年第2期69-77,共9页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

摘　　要：疑罪从无作为刑事诉讼无罪推定原则的基本要求,对于被告人被控诉行为的证明标准和控诉方的证明责任均有严格限制。基于客观事实和法律事实的现实差异性,法庭审判中各方的认知案情能力必须以效率、效益和公正作为价值判断,疑罪从无原则在保障人权、防范冤假错案和推动司法文明进程中的程序作用不可阙如。对于疑罪不能采取有罪推定的立场,有罪推定不符合人权保障的基本要求,总结疑罪从无原则司法适用的判断标准,以期进一步提升证据裁判原则在当前司法体制改革背景下的适应性和生命力。Doubtful crime is a basic requirement of the presumption of innocence in criminal procedure. It strictly limits the defendants＇ standard of proof and the burden of proof of the accused. The difference in objective facts and legal facts of the case based on the cognitive ability of the parties in the trial must be based on efficiency and justice as value judgment.The function of the suspected crime principle are not known in the protection of human rights,miscarriages of justice and the promotion of judicial procedure in the process of civilization.The presumption of guilt position cannot be adopted for suspected crimes.The presumption of guilt does not meet the basic requirements of the protection of human rights. The summary of the standard of nonprinciple of suspect crime could enhance the adaptability and vitality of the principle of evidence refree.

关 键 词：庭审实质化 疑罪从无 无罪推定 证据裁判原则 非法证据排除规则 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]