检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]郑州大学第一附属医院口腔正畸科,河南郑州450000
出 处:《河南医学研究》2018年第1期30-32,共3页Henan Medical Research
摘 要:目的比较正畸治疗中选择传统托槽矫治器与新型无托槽隐形矫治器患者的基本情况与满意度。方法选取2016—2017年在郑州大学第一附属医院行正畸治疗的47例患者,根据所选的矫治器将患者分为A组(选择传统托槽矫治器)与B组(选择隐形矫治器)。通过问卷调查分析患者的基本情况和满意度。结果两组患者年龄、性别及学历比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组在治疗费用与外观美观性方面的满意度比较,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论选用隐形矫治器的患者多为成年人,学历较高,且以女性多见。传统托槽矫治器费用较低,隐形矫治器较为美观。Objective To compare basic condition and satisfaction of patients with the brackets and the invisalign in ortho- dontic treatment Methods Forty - seven patients in orthodontic treatment were selected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from 2016 to 2017. Forty -seven patients were divided into group A( patients with the brackets) and group B (patients with the invisalign). The basic condition and satisfaction of patients were analyzed by questionnaire. Results The differences in age, sex and education of the two groups were statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). The differences of satisfaction between the cost of treatment and the appearance aesthetics were statistically significant ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion The patients choosing the invisalign were mostly adults with higher education and more female sex. The advantage of the troditional brackets was the lower cost and the advantage of the invisalign was the better appearance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43