3D与2D腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的对比研究  

Comparative Study on 3D and 2D Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer

作　　者：陈翔[1] CHEN Xiang(The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University/Qingyuan People＇s Hospital, Qingyuan 511518, Chin)

机构地区：[1]广州医科大学附属第六医院/清远市人民医院,广东清远511518

出　　处：《临床医学工程》2018年第3期287-288,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering

摘　　要：目的探讨3D与2D腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的应用效果。方法选取我院2012年6月至2017年6月期间收治的72例直肠癌患者,随机分为两组各36例。对照组采用2D腹腔镜直肠癌根治术治疗,观察组采用3D腹腔镜直肠癌根治术治疗。分析对比两组患者的治疗效果。结果观察组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、导管留置时间均明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者的淋巴清扫数目和并发症发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论与2D腹腔镜相比,采用3D腹腔镜直肠癌根治术治疗,可缩短患者的手术时间,降低术中出血量,促进术后排尿功能恢复,值得临床推广。Objective To explore the application effects of 3D and 2D laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. Methods 72 cases of patients with rectal cancer admitted to our hospital from June 2012 and June 2017 were selected and randomly divided into two groups, with 36 cases in each group. The control group received 2D laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer, while the observation group received 3D laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. The treatment effects were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time and catheter indwelling time of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group （P 〈0.05）. No statistical difference was found in the number of lymphatic dissection and incidence of complications between the two groups （P〉0.05）. Conclusions Compared with 2D laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer, 3D laparoscopic radical resection of rectal carcinoma can shorten the operation time of patients, reduce the intraoperative blood loss and promote the postoperative recovery of urination function, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

关 键 词：3D腹腔镜 2D腹腔镜 直肠癌根治术 

分 类 号：R735.37[医药卫生—肿瘤]