检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张宝[1] Zhang Bao
出 处:《法学杂志》2018年第4期109-115,共7页Law Science Magazine
基 金:2016年河南省法学会课题"刑事案件速裁机制研究"(课题编号:HNLS2016A16)的阶段性成果
摘 要:我国刑事速裁程序试点以来取得了积极成效,但同时也暴露出权力色彩过重、体系思考不足、适用范围过窄、法律援助值班律师制度虚置、庭审流程不明确、被害人权利保障阙如等问题。完善刑事速裁程序有必要进一步强化权利设计理念,进一步加强体系性建构、进一步扩大适用范围、进一步完善援助律师制度、进一步完善庭审机制、进一步强化被害人权利保障。It has made positive results since the experimental unit of criminal speedy trial procedure was instituted in china. But there are still some problems are exposed such as too much is intervention of power,the deficiency of thinking foundation,the narrow scope of application,the non-performance of legal aid system while the ambiguity of the trial process and the absence of the victim rights protection system. To perfect the criminal speedy trial procedure it's necessary to strengthen the design concept of the rights,to expend the scope of application,to improve the lawyer aid system and trial mechanism and to strengthen the protection of the rights of the victim.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222