检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张萍[1] Zhang Ping(The Supreme People's Procuratorate of the People's Republic of China, Beijing, 100726; China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, 10008)
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学,北京100088
出 处:《证据科学》2018年第1期16-28,共13页Evidence Science
摘 要:在审查逮捕环节排除非法证据,具有客观中立、高效快捷、程序简便、司法成本较低等明显的阶段优势和独特的诉讼价值,甚至可以认为,审查逮捕环节非法证据排除规则的依法准确适用是防范冤错案件的关键之一。本文对人民检察院审查逮捕阶段适用非法证据排除规则的必要性、理论依据进行系统研究,并结合当下的司法实践展开深入分析,揭示存在的问题、阐释问题产生的深层次原因,并对未来的改革完善提出有针对性的解决方案。Excluding illegally obtained evidence in the stage of reviewing the arrest has obvious advantages and unique litigation value such as being objective and neutral, efficient and quick, simple procedure and low judicial costs. It can even be considered that the accurate and lawful application of the exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence during the process reviewing the arrests is one of the keys to preventing wrong convictions. This article systematically researches on the necessity and theoretical basis of the application of exclusionary rules of illegally obtained evidence conducted by the People's Procuratorate in the stage of reviewing the arrest, and conducts an in-depth analysis based on the current judicial practice to reveal the existing problems, explain the underlying reasons for those problems and propose targeted solutions for the future reforms and improvements.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33