论刑事冤错案的定罪后救济——基于杨金柱案及美国宾州定罪后救济程序的思考  

On Post-conviction Remedies for Criminal Miscarriage Cases:Reflections on Yang Jin-zhu Case and Post-conviction Remedy Procedures in Pennsylvania of USA

作　　者：孙明泽[1] 冯科臻 SUN Ming-ze;Feng Ke-zhen(Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学

出　　处：《广西警察学院学报》2018年第1期13-18,共6页Journal of Guangxi Police College

基　　金：西南政法大学法学院2017年度学生科研创新项目(LX2017007);2016年内蒙古科技大学创新基金项目(2016QDW-S06)

摘　　要：2017年杨金柱案最终无罪判决的结果不仅是其个人坚持的结果,也是法律人对正义底线的坚守,更是 我国刑事法治不断进步的体现.该案体现了我国定罪后申诉制度的发展,目前我国定罪后救济制度还不完善,需 要进一步发展.美国宾夕法尼亚州有相对完善的定罪后救济体系,对我国具有借鉴价值.我国定罪后救济制度应 当从理念的转变、救济方式的多元化、法律规定的详尽等方面入手,逐步形成完善的刑事申诉救济体系.Acquittal of Yang Jin-zhu Case is attributed to Yang＇ individual persistence as well as the lawyers＇ sticking to justice bottom line, and more importantly, reflects continuous progress of China criminal rule of law. The present defective post-conviction remedy system in China calls for further improvement. The relatively impeccable post-conviction remedy system in Pennsylvania of USA is of reference value for China. The post-conviction remedy system in China calls for step-by-step development of impeccable appeal remedy system by starting with ideas transformation, remedy diversification and comprehensiveness of laws and regulations.

关 键 词：刑事冤错案 无罪推定 司法理念 申诉制度 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]