认罪认罚自愿性保障的实证考察  

An Evidence-Based Investigation into the Voluntary Nature of Surrender and Confession

作　　者：施珠妹 郭航 Zhushu Shi;Hang Guo(Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing, 401120)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120

出　　处：《净月学刊》2018年第2期24-33,共10页Journal of Jilin Public Security Academy

基　　金：重庆市2016年研究生科研创新项目"在押未决犯的会见交流权"的阶段性研究成果;项目编号:CYB16085

摘　　要：从现有规范看,立法对保障被追诉人认罪认罚的自愿性高度重视,从适用范围、知情权、律师帮助权等多方面予以保障。但是,实践中对认罪认罚自愿性权利保障体系仍然不完善,权力制衡机制作用也非常有限。因此,保障被追诉人免受强迫认罪,需要一系列相互衔接、逻辑严密的权利保障体系,例如建立并落实知情权的有关规定,完善值班律师制度以及保障被追诉人的救济权等。同时,需要进一步对有关权力予以制衡,以减少强迫认罪认罚的发生,例如确立侦查机关讯问时律师在场制度、打破录音录像程序单方垄断现状、侦查人员出庭作证不再适用"兜底性"的规定、对认罪认罚的自愿性进行实质审查等。Based on existing regulations, the voluntary nature of surrender and confession has bee taken seriously by legislation and guaranteed in terms of range of application, right of being informed and right of assistance by attorneys. However, this system of guarantee is still far from perfect, and the power balancing mechanism is also functioning limitedly. Therefore, in order to protect the convicted from being forced to confess, a series of co-linked and highly logical right guarantee system is necessary. At the same time, relevant powers should also be balanced in order to prevent forced conviction to happen. Attorneys should be present in the process of interrogations and videos and audios should be released from monopoly.

关 键 词：认罪认罚 自愿性 权利保障体系 权力制衡机制 

分 类 号：DF71[政治法律—诉讼法学]